Saturday, May 21, 2005

Newsweak: Journalists Need a Defense

No one denies that Newsweek’s error was egregious and awful, and no one denies that its ramifications were even more devastating: riots breaking out, reputations being obliterated, professional lives being destroyed, and the United States' already depleted world image sinking even lower. However, this is not a Jason Blairesque debacle, and this is not an issue of poor journalism; an anonymous source within the Bush administration was employed, two pentagon officials were used to verify, and still they got the story wrong. Sure the mistake was terrible, but as far as I’m concerned no flagrant breech of journalistic ethics occurred here, and certainly nothing deserving of the character assassination Newsweek is receiving.

Make no mistake, Michael Isikoff (the reporter here) is an expert veteran and Editor-in-Chief Mark Whittaker is a highly esteemed journalist who, if anything, is often viewed as being overly cautious, not underly. Congressman Bob Ney, an honorable representative if I’ve ever saw one, has accused the two of no less treason, of “fabricating” the entire story, even calling their actions “criminal”. Radical republicans postulate that Newsweeks’ actions are motivated by some type of debase, unpatriotic, liberal desire to destroy American credibility. Though with less virulence, even the Bush administration has hacked away at Newsweek.

Does anyone else find it ironic that the Bush administration is slandering a news organization for not quadruple checking their anonymous source? This coming from an administration who staged an entire war based on information from one anonymous defector named Curveball, one who was warned by the CIA to be both crazy and a liar. Anonymous sourcing is an industry norm, why can’t journalists stand up for themselves?

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Congrats, your officially a radical. You've discreditted yourself and killed any bipartisan following.

Jake McGuire said...

I don't think you can blame an article for causing riots. You CAN, however, blame an unsubstantiated, protracted, unilateral war. These people were ready to riot anyway; the Koran story was just a spark on the powder keg.

Who knows? Maybe it is right. We're really not in a position to verify it. If they're willing to rub fake menstrual blood on a prisoner's face, or wrap him in an Israeli flag, why wouldn't they desecrate the Koran? I was particularly disgusted with Andrew Sullivan's story about the prisoner that was chained to the top of his cell for four days, beaten in the legs during his interrogation to the point of not being able to sit still, and then being sent back to his cell and chained up again after denying him medical attention. He died, and the kicker is that officers and interrogators thought he was just an innocent taxi driver that happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I may not get into Yale, but you can bet that I'm not joining the armed forced, either.

Jake McGuire said...

Sorry for the double post... I forgot to mention that A VIEW FROM THE WEST IS BACK, BABY!