Saturday, May 14, 2005

Nuclear Option: The Right's War on Dissent


In 1832, the famous observer of American democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville, warned our young nation that, “If ever the free institutions of America are destroyed, that event will arise from the unlimited tyranny of the majority.” If his words hold true today, then the political importance of the filibuster, a tool used to preserve minority political power within the Senate, runs to very threads of our freedom as people. Radical republican majority leader Bill Frist, however, doesn’t hide the fact that he holds no regard for this fundamental tool for preserving dissent, claiming that he plans to “go nuclear” the Democrats’ right to filibuster judicial nominees sometime next week. All this, it seems, just so that even the most radical of George Bush’s court nominees can be empowered with a mere 51 member vote, easily obtained in the 55-45 Republican dominated Senate. The aptly titled “Nuclear Option” for destroying the filibuster on the Judicial Nominee, if passed, would effectively leave 200 years of Senate precedent and 225 years of American tradition of checks and balances, freedom of dissent, and freedom of speech, in nuclear rubble.

PS- expect a complete article on the subject soon.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Senate is 55-44-1, prick.

Anonymous said...

Where in our Constitution does it say that the minority in the Senate has the right to stop votes on judicial nominees?

Anonymous said...

Indeed.

Throughout "225 years of American tradition," just one judicial filibuster has been successful, and only a few more been attempted.

Senate precedent?
I think not.

As for your bit about "tyranny of the majority," tyranny of the minority is the greater threat to a democratic society.

Jake McGuire said...

The Senate has a constitutional right to set its own procedures, including filabustering to stop a vote. If they want to change the rules, so be it--we're just going to be pissed at them. But let's be clear that the issue is not constitutionality, but rather the arrogance of a hijacked GOP that is going to get its ass handed to them in November 2006, just like the Democrats in 1993.